Welcome to Judge Gale Trial 05/21/07

1. A case of first impression in the US is a cover-up (1 of 3). 2. Judge Gale Cover-up for the IRS Exterminator (3of 3 ). 3. A victim to the IRS exterminator (2 of 3).

Judge Gale, of the US tax court, had a chance to restore the American dream for Arab-Americans but instead joined the ranks of other corrupt judges in supporting the Jewish takeover of Mourad's real estate development worth > $40 million. Mourad has been left penniless, owing $800k to the IRS for taxes on money he never received . In the year 2010, I will seek refuge and reinstate my citizenship in the Middle East, where at least I will have the support of my brothers.


Alphonse Mourad's Final Motion Protesting Judge Gale (Unted Staes Tax Court)Failure To Render A Decision In Over Two Years From The Trial, Placing Alphonse Mourad In Finacial, Life and Health Risks. July 22, 2009. Also, Mourad Protest www.uscorruptjudges.com

YouTube Video
Click here to view Mourad's 08/15/07 Brief filed before Judge Gayle, which has yet to be ruled on.

Click here for the transcript of the 5/21/07 trial in PDF document form for printing.





U.S. TAX COURT JUDGE JOSEPH GALE
U.S. Tax Court Judge Joseph Gale put the final nail in my court coffin, on September 17, 2009, by rejecting my challenge to the I.R.S. levy.
The case was tried on May 21, 2007. Judge Gale waited two years and three months to render his decision. During all that time, the case and financial pressures of having enormous tax levies hanging over my head for income I never received caused me considerable stress.
For history on the case, see my July 27, 2009 Motion protesting Judge Gale's failure to render a ruling in over two years.
In his September 17, 2009 decision, Judge Gale affirmed IRS levies against me personally on taxes for 1999 K-1 income never received by me (Mourad), but received by the Bankruptcy Trustee for V&M Management, Inc. When the IRS assessed the 1997 taxes that is the subject of this case, my (Mourad's) tax was $189,745. As of June 30, 2009, that 1997 tax, with interest and penalties, is $434,917.53. When the IRS assessed the 1999 taxes, that tax was $107,502.02. As of June 30, 2009, the IRS has assessed interest and penalties of $264,350.40.
1997 Tax 6/30/09 Assessed
$189,745 Penalties and Interest
$434,917.53
1999 Tax
$107,502 $264,350.90
Total $297,147 $699,268.43
To owe over $700,000 in IRS taxes, interest and penalties, on monies or income never received has paralyzed my life. As a taxpayer, no U.S. citizen should have to wait this long for a decision, or for a wrong decision.
These tax liabilities are on a Subchapter S Corporation is for profit that I (Mourad) never received, but that the Bankruptcy Court appointed Trustee for V&M Management, Inc. Stephen S. Gray, received and then sold the property to Beacon Residential Properties, along with the $12 million tax credit, that enabled Beacon Residential to profit from the acquisition, Trustee Gray made $2.7 million profit from the sale. The $12 million tax credits can only be awarded to a ten year property owner, and only my (Mourad's), company V&M Management, Inc., was statutorily qualified, under 26 U.S.C 42, but the Bankruptcy Court allowed the Trustee to transfer the tax credits to Beacon Residential, and not to me (Mourad). Had I (Mourad) properly received the $12 million in tax credits, I could afford to pay the IRS. Rather, Beacon Residential got the $12 million tax credit, and escaped tax liabilities shifted to me (Mourad). That is wrong, unjust and corrupt.
The First Circuit Panel of Judges, Torruella, Lynch, and Coffin, that ruled against Mourad, Mourad v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 387 F.2d.27 (1st Cir. 2004), contradicted its earlier 2003 decision in In Re V&M Management, Inc. 321 F.3d.6 (1st Cir. 2003). If I (Mourad) was not an equity owner in the subchapter S V&M Management, Inc., then I (Mourad) could not be assessed these taxes, interest and penalties. The public should be made aware that the same judges are making inconsistent rulings that raises a question of their competency or memories. Maybe there should be a memory test for federal judges.
Judge Gale worked with NY Democratic Senator Moynihan, and he may be biased or conflicted in that I (Mourad) opposed the Democratic Party's gentrification of the Roxbury section of Boston. For more information and background on this history, see www.alphonsemourad.com. Type the link into the browser and go to The Democratic Party button. Also, scroll down the home page of the web site and click on the pictures of the players, Senator John Kerry, Senator Ted Kennedy, former Massachusetts Attorney General Scott Harshbarger, Mayor Thomas Menino, former Mayor Ray Flynn, former Governor Michael Dukakis, and former HUD Secretary Henry Cisneros for more information about each party.
The agenda of The Democratic Party was to oust me (Mourad) from the Mandela Development in order to gentrify the Lower Roxbury area and carry out their plan for urban renewal. These governmental entities have been at odds with me (Mourad) since I (Mourad) supported the incorporation of Lower Roxbury, for it to become its own city, back in 1987, and for re-naming the development "Mandela" with a large 70 foot sign placed upon the building in honor of Nelson Mandela. The plan was to build a new, multicultural community over thirty acres of land that was owned by the Boston Redevelopment Authority and the City of Boston, and to rehabilitate the housing and offer its current residents and other working class poor, the right to much more than affordable housing - them home ownership. This plan was obviously not well received by the governmental entities. Click on Nelson Mandela's picture on Mourad's web site for more information regarding the Mandela Incorporation.
Judge Gale's decision may have been compromised for this reason as well. A Panel of Three Judges (Judge Torruella, Circuit Judge; Judge Lynch, Circuit Judge; and Judge Coffin, Senior Circuit Judge) denied my (Mourad's) Motion on August 10, 2005 FOR RECONSIDERATION AND COVER UP TO PROTECT I.R.S ATTORNEY, TERESA McLAUGHLIN'S FRAUDULENT STATEMENTS. These fraudulent statements cost me $12,000,000 in tax credits that should have been awarded to me, as well as $2,624,554 in capital gains I never received either. The IRS attorney made fraudulent statements to the three Judges. One of them was that Beacon Residential Properties applied for the $12,000,000 tax credit in 1998, when in fact, Trustee Stephen Gray, who was appointed the owner of V&M Management by Bankruptcy Judge Carol J. Kenner, applied for the tax credit and was approved for it in 1997. For Judge Gale to have ruled in my favor, he would have to overturn and uncover the corruption that had taken place by the three other Panel Judges and IRS attorney Teresa McLaughlin, obviously placing him in a biased predicament. For more information regarding the three Panel Judges, go to www.uscorruptjudges.com.
My case on YouTube worldwide, where the corruption and injustice of the U.S. Governmental entities and the Jewish takeover (www.jewishtakeover.com), towards Arab Americans can bee seen. Please visit the following link to see Mourad's video www.youtube.com/user/mouradprotest.
Judge Gale's September 17, 2009 decision is just the latest in a long line of judicial decisions denying me my rights as a taxpayer and citizen, and why I refuse to participate in jury service.




Home | Contact Info | IRS Hot Topics | Judge Gales Opinion 9/17/09 | Mourad 08/15/07 Brief | Internal Revenue 08/03/07 Brief | Trial Transcript 5/22/07
Pretrial memorandum 5/21/07 | Pre Trial Order | Letter to Judge Gale | Exhibits to Letter | ORDER | Mourad Denouncing Citizen | Mourad Appeal Brief