US. Department of Housing and Urban Development Boston Regional Office, Region 1 Thomas P. 0'Neil, Jr. Federal Building 10 Causeway Street Boston, Massachusetts 02222
JUL 22, 1993
Mr. Alphonse Mourad President V & M Management Company, Inc. 131 Coolidge Avenue, #620 Watertown, MA 02172
Dear Mr. Mourad;
Your letter of June 2, 1993 to President William Clinton has been referred to my office by the HUD Regional Inspector General for Investigation for administrative handling.
You know we have been aware of your problems with the utility companies and the City of Boston tax authority, as they affect the Mandela Project. We remain concerned about the costs inherent in the project that adversely effect the preservation of the low-income statue of this project. We believe your appeals to the state regulatory agency and the tax authority are appropriate action at this time.
The Regional Inspector General for Investigation has indicated to us that further investigation will not be conducted at this time. You may wish to confirm this by calling his office at (617} 565-5293. Should you wish to talk about this problem,, I can be reached at (617) 565-5408.
Very sincerely yours, Edward B. Rick, Director Program Support Staff Office of Housing ________________________________________________ U. S. Department of Housing *nd Urban Divlopmont Washingioi). D.C. 20410
July 9, 1993
OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR HOUSING-FEDERAL HOUSING COMMISSIONER
Mr. Alphonse Mourad President V & M Management Company, Inc. 131 Coolidge Avenue, #620 Watertown, MA 02172
Dear Mr. Mourad:
President Clinton received your letter of June 2, 1993, and asked the Department of Housing and Urban Development to respond to you.
The Department appreciates your effort in writing about the problems you have observed. HUD agrees that the Federal Government has a responsibility to conserve taxpayers' money. Since you believe that unfair tax and utility rates result in waste and mismanagement of Federal Government programs, I am forwarding your package to HUD.'s Regional Inspector General for Investigation in Boston, Raymond A. Carolan.
I believe you have acted correctly in referring your specific concerns about the utility rates charged to your project to the appropriate State regulatory agency, the Department of Public Utilities. Your concern about tax rates should be addressed to the appropriate local taxing jurisdiction.
I hope that this information is helpful and that you are able to resolve your concerns.
Very sincerely yours, James H. Peterson, Director Housing Communications Division _______________________________________________ THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON
June 18, 1993
Mr. Alphonse Mourad President V & M Management Number 620 131 Coolidge Avenue Watertown, Massachusetts 02172
Dear Mr. Mourad:
Thank you so much for your letter. President Clinton greatly appreciates the trust and confidence you have expressed in him by writing.
To give your concerns the special attention they deserve, the President has asked me to forward your letter to the Department of Housing and Urban Development. I have asked them to provide you with a prompt reply, but please bear in mind that it may take several weeks to look thoroughly into the concerns you have raised. Should you have any questions after reviewing their response, you may write to: Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street, S.w., Washington, D.C. 20410.
Many thanks for your patience.
Sincerely, Marsha Scott Deputy Assistant to the President Director of Correspondence and Presidential Messages ________________________________________________ THE VICE PRESIDENT WASHINGTON
June 9, 1993 Mr. Alphonse Mourad 131 Coolidge Avenue, #620 Watertown, Massachusetts 02172
Dear Mr. Mourad:
Thank you for sending me a copy of information about your proposal for housing. 7 found this material both interesting and informative, and I appreciate receiving it.
As you know, I am working with the President to meet the challenges facing our country in a positive and responsible manner. We need and value the views, suggestions, and proposals of the American people, and I can assure you that your approach will be given careful attention.
Again, thank you for writing. I appreciate the effort you made to bring your suggestions to my attention, and J know that I will benefit from them.
Sincerely,
Al Gore ________________________________________________ U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Washington, D.C. 20410-8000
April 7, 1993
Mr. Alphonse Mourad President V & M Management Co., Inc. 10 Hammond Street Boston, MA 02120
Dear Mr. Mourad:
Thank you for your letters of March 16, 1993, to Secretary Cisneros and Assistant Secretary Designate Retsinas, concerning your application for Section 223(f) financing for the . Mandela Apartments in Roxbury, Massachusetts.
The Department of Housing and Urban Developments (HUD's) Boston Office has advised that TRI Capital Corporation has projected a June 25, 1993, delivery date for their delegated underwriting processing for the subject project. Their projected date is based upon their receipt by May 1, 1993, of the 25 exhibits recently requested from you.
Review of the delegated processing by HUD's Boston Office and issuance of the firm commitment should be within 30 days after receipt of TRI Capital Corporation's processing, if the underwriting analysis supports its issuance.
A copy of your letter and background data concerning project taxes and utility interest charges, as they relate to Section 8 subsidized projects, and management concepts have been furnished to Messers. Albert B. Sullivan, Director, Office of Multifamily Housing Management, and Frank M. Malone, Director, Office of Preservation and Property Disposition, so they may benefit from your experiences with the Mandela Apartments.
Thank you for bringing these issues to our attention.
Very sincerely yours,
Joseph E. Malley Deputy Director Office of Insured Multifamily Housing Development ___________________________________________ DPU sets new limits to rates of interest on overdue bills
Boston Herald; Boston, Mass.; Oct 1,1994; JEFFREY KRASNER;
Abstract: The DPU's order comes in response to a request from Alphonse Mourad, owner of the Mandela Apartments in Roxbury. For years, Mourad has waged an angry battle against Boston Edison, alleging that the utility has overcharged the complex and generated excessive and inaccurate bills. He claimed that he had overpaid his bills by $29,000, but that Edison refused to disclose its accounting records.
Full Text: Copyright Boston Herald Library Oct 1, 1994
Commercial customers with overdue accounts at local utilities will see their total bills grow more slowly thanks to the efforts of the owner of a Roxbury apartment complex who has had a long battle with Boston Edison.
The Department of Public Utilities this week instituted new limits on the rate of interest gas, electric and phone companies can charge to their past due commercial accounts.
Instead of a flat 18 percent interest, the utilities' maximum interest will be set at the two-year Treasury bill rate plus 10 percent. The new rate, which goes into effect Nov. 1, will drop to 14.05 percent.
The DPU's order comes in response to a request from Alphonse Mourad, owner of the Mandela Apartments in Roxbury. For years, Mourad has waged an angry battle against Boston Edison, alleging that the utility has overcharged the complex and generated excessive and inaccurate bills. He claimed that he had overpaid his bills by $29,000, but that Edison refused to disclose its accounting records.
In its order, the three DPU commissioners argued that late payment interest charges should remain relatively high.
"While it is one of the Department's goals to make late payment charges more reflective of current interest rates, it is also important to ensure that late payment charges remain high enough to deter delinquent payment of accounts."
They rejected a proposal to let rates float at 8 percentage points over the two-year Treasury bill, and instead adopted a 10 percent premium, to be computed Feb. 1 of each year.
The order does not affect overdue accounts for residential customers, on which utilities are prohibited from charging interest.
But the commissioners warned utilities against harassing customers, saying it "expects companies to suspend late payment charges where a customer has a good faith and reasonably grounded dispute on billed amounts, and abate late payment charges where the amount in dispute is determined to be erroneous."
Sub Title: [01 Edition] Start Page: 015 ISSN: 07385854 Companies: Boston Edison Co Duns.00-695-1552
Mourad is also in federal court, fighting a request by Boston Edison that the 276-unit apartment complex be placed in receivership.
The DPU has permitted 18 percent interest since the 1970s. Victor Aronow, attorney for Mourad, said 18 percent interest is no longer justified.
DPU Chairman Ken Gordon said yesterday he favors considering a change in the rate of interest charged.
But Gordon rejected the notion that compound interest is unfair. "This is common practice and has been since Roman times."
Unpaid bills are usually added to the basis used in utility rate requests, he said. "The commission's sympathy goes out - not to the company's shareholders - but to ratepayers."
Residential customers cannot be charged compound interest. The DPU treats Mandela as a business because apartments do not have individual meters.
Edison spokeswoman Sheila Eppolito said the company will not publicly discuss any issues between itself and any particular ratepayer. However, she said the utility has complied with regulators.
"It is up to the DPU how we charge customers and the rate we charge. All that has to be approved by the DPU."
Aronow said a study by the Goodman Group shows Edison's billing practices have been unreliable. "We believe there's a question of whether V&M really owes anything at all." _______________________________________________ Developer sues for late fee changes
Boston Herald-, Boston, Mass.; Dec 22, 1992; MICHAEL E. KNELL;
Abstract: [Alphonse Mourad] blamed late penalties and compound interest - which are not charged to residential customers - for much of V&M's huge utility debts.
Mandela Apartments include 276 units and about 1,500 low-income tenants. Mourad has argued that the definition of commercial customer is too broadly interpreted.
Mourad filed a complaint with the DPU in February. He said he went to court because the DPU would not issue a decision on his request for changes.
Full Text: Copyright Boston Herald Library Dec 22, 1992
The developer of the Mandela Apartments has sued state officials and local utilities, asking for changes in how late fees are assessed.
V&M Management Co. and its president, Alphonse Mourad, last week filed suit in Superior Court against the state Department of Public Utilities, Boston Electric Co. and Boston Gas.
The suit asked that interest rates be dropped from their current 18 percent, that utilities be forbidden from charging compound interest and be forced to read meters each month rather than issue estimated bills.
Mourad blamed late penalties and compound interest - which are not charged to residential customers - for much of V&M's huge utility debts.
Mandela Apartments include 276 units and about 1,500 low-income tenants. Mourad has argued that the definition of commercial customer is too broadly interpreted.
DPU officials declined comment. The office of the Attorney General, which often represents state agencies, also washed its hands of the matter.
"We don't ordinarily represent the DPU in disputes against individual ratepayers," AG spokeswoman Elizabeth Hyman said.
Boston Edison spokesman Michael Monahan declined comment on the specifics of Mourad's case, but issued a defense of Edison practices.
"The procedures which we use are all in accordance with state regulations," he said. "Most importantly, the procedures are in place so that customers who do pay their bills in a timely fashion do not subsidize those who choose not to."
Mourad filed a complaint with the DPU in February. He said he went to court because the DPU would not issue a decision on his request for changes. ________________________________________________ Landlord cries foul over late fees Slams 18% interest charged by Edison
Boston Herald-, Boston, Mass.; Dec 2, 1992; MICHAEL E. KNELL;
Abstract: Alphonse Mourad, controversial owner of several properties including 1,500-unit Mandela apartments on Washington Street in Roxbury, argues that the 18 percent interest charged on late payments could kill his business and others that fall behind.
Utility officials will not discuss Mourad's situation, but they reject the notion that their billing is unfair. After supplying a product and a service, it costs utilities money when the bill isn't paid, [William Lippincott] said.
Mourad filed a complaint against both Edison and Boston Gas with the Department of Public Utilities, asking officials to revise rates for late payments.
Full Text: Copyright Boston Herald Library Dec 2, 1992
One of the city's feistier landlords says his dispute with utilities and state officials is a battle to stop a rip-off 18 percent rate for late payments.
Alphonse Mourad, controversial owner of several properties including 1,500-unit Mandela apartments on Washington Street in Roxbury, argues that the 18 percent interest charged on late payments could kill his business and others that fall behind.
Mourad said he has paid $1.1 million to Edison, but still owes $259,815, including $186,000 in interest.
"What was good in the 1970s when interest rates were high - is that good in 1992 when there is a recession and the prime lending rate is 6 percent?" said Mourad, a veteran of conflicts with local officials.
"They respond, 'just pay your bill.' That's not the issue."
Mark Cooper, research director of the Consumer Federation of America, agreed that the 18 percent rate is unfair in a time of low inflation and interest rates,
"I think 18 percent is outrageous," he said. "We're outraged that the credit card folks are still getting 18 percent."
But Cooper acknowledged that late payments have skyrocketed.
William Lippincott, manager of credit collection at Boston Edison, said businesses whose payments used to lag a month are often 60 days behind. Those which used to lag 60 days are now three months behind, he said. "It's a reflection of the economy."
Utility officials will not discuss Mourad's situation, but they reject the notion that their billing is unfair. After supplying a product and a service, it costs utilities money when the bill isn't paid, Lippincott said.
Late payment interest makes up for the cost of collecting bills as well as for carrying debts that are never paid, he said.
The rate was last changed in the 1970s. Since then, the Department of Public Utilities has routinely ratified it with each new utility rate case, said director Tim Shevlin. "We could say no, but we don't."
But if rates for late payments are lowered, they would encourage non-payment, he said. "Utilities are not in the business of extending credit. They are not lenders, so it's not relevant that the prime interest rate is only 6 percent."
Besides, if a business doesn't pay for the power it uses, the ratepayers will, Shevlin said. What utilities should charge depends on how the cost of unpaid bills is defined, Cooper said. Is it the cost of the utility's borrowing short-term money to make up the shortfall? Or it is only the lost income for money the utility didn't have in the bank?
Short-term savings rates are about 3 percent.
Cooper recommends a rate similar to mid-range borrowing rates, now about 12 percent.
Mourad also has wider concerns. He said he believes utilities support city efforts to run him out of business so that Mandela can eventually be leveled as part of a high-profit redevelopment of the area.
Mourad said he fell behind in his utility payments while he was spending nearly $800,000 in legal fees fighting the city and the Boston Redevelopment Authority.
"If they had not cost me that money, I would not owe the utilities money today," he said.
Mourad filed a complaint against both Edison and Boston Gas with the Department of Public Utilities, asking officials to revise rates for late payments.
|
|